#Ostern 2016 datum software#
#Ostern 2016 datum license#
#Ostern 2016 datum free#

Let’s first start with the typical way to collect data: the server-side aggregation, We want to show you why the industry standard approach has privacy risks. There are several approaches to collect the data needed for quality assesssment.

That would be a good signal that Cliqz’s results for query q need to be improved. Simply observe the event in which a user does a query q in Cliqz and then, within one hour, does the same query on a different search engine. It is easy to do if the user’s help us with their data. A very legitimate use-case, let’s call it bad-queries. Since Cliqz is a search engine we need to know for which queries our results are not good enough. Let us illustrate it with an example (a real one), This is a strong departure from the industry standard of data collections. Consequently, aggregation of user’s data in the server-side (on Cliqz premises) is not technically feasible, as we have no means to know who is the original owner of the data. How? Because any user-identifier that could be used to link records as belonging to the same person are strictly forbidden, not only explicit UID’s but also implicit ones. The Human Web basically is a methodology and system designed to collect data, which cannot be turned into sessions once they reached Cliqz. But still, the session is there, stored somewhere, and trust that it is not going to be misused is the only protection we have. Will Google Analytics try to de-anonymize the data? I bet not. For instance, Google Analytics data can be used to build sessions that can sometimes be de-anonymized by anyone that has access to them. This linkage leads to sessions, and these sessions, are very dangerous with regards to privacy. messages, records, come from the same user. Record linkage is basically the ability to know that multiple data elements, e.g. The fundamental idea of the Human Web data collection is simple: to actively prevent Record Linkage. The Human Web is our proposal for a more responsible and less invasive data collection from users.

#Ostern 2016 datum free#

As someone once said, if you do not like reality feel free to change it. It is not enough for us, should not be enough for our users either.

We are not comfortable with only a promise based on a Terms of Service and Privacy Policy agreement. We use our own products, and consequently, our own data is collected. This is not something that we want to be part of, if only for selfish reasons. In the current model the user has little control. Finally, companies can unilaterally decide to change their privacy policies. Companies can go bankrupt and the data auctioned to the highest bidder. Unethical employees can dig on the data for personal interests. Governments can issue subpoenas, or get direct access to the data. Legal obligations aside, there are many ways this trust model can fail. We want to depart from the current standard model, where users must trust that the company collecting the data will not miss-use it, ever, in any circumstance. This data, provided by Cliqz users, is collected in a very different way than typical data collection. Human Web is a methodology and system developed by Cliqz to collect data from users while protecting their privacy and anonymity.Ĭliqz needs data to power the services it offers: search, tracking protection, anti-phishing, etc. Not removing this gist for historical reasons. We recommend to read the article on Cliqz Tech blog, the content is more up to date there. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.Konark Modi, Alex Catarineu, Philipp Claßen and Josep M. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file.

#Ostern 2016 datum software#

This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it.

#Ostern 2016 datum license#

GFDL GNU Free Documentation License true true A copy of the license is included in the section entitled GNU Free Documentation License. Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. CC BY-SA 3.0 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 true true share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.

to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work.